Find a Lawyer

SHAH BANO versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER (S.H.O.), POLICE STATION TANDLIANWALA

In the custody of the minor application for Section 491 Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890), Sections 12 and 25 petitioner (mother), it was prayed that her minor son, who is 5 years of age, whom the applicant's plaintiff sought. / Ex-husband removed illegally, his custody may be referred to his application under Section 491, CR PC, no doubt whenever the court fears removing the ward from the jurisdiction of the court If so, the sanction of the application under Sections 2S and 12 Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 could not be moved. Or the mother who was fighting a lawsuit with zeal and enthusiasm for custody, especially when the minor was illegally removed from her custody by the father, but illegally in her presence There was no legal removal case, before the petition was filed under section 491, the CCP alleging before the district judge that his minor son was illegally removed. There was a dispute over the custody of the minor district judge, before the Guardian Judge Petitioner ever challenged the order, directed to file an application under Sections 12 and 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, and after the case was remanded, she went missing. And the Guardian Judge Petitioner did not show that by his conduct he was not entitled to any relief under Section 491, the PC Paramount would be the welfare of the minor, which was well received by his father / defendant. I know, that was also his. No instructions can be granted to allow natural guardian to declare juvenile detention illegal with defendant / father ask a advocate free from Dudial lawyer