Find a Lawyer

FALAK SHER versus STATE

Section 2302/4 324/7 337 / F (i) / 148/149 The trial court allowed the inspector to leave as an unnecessary witness when his chief was already in the inspector's office as his inspector's chief. Was tested. In this case, he recorded statements of certain witnesses under Section 161, CRPC, and the submission of an incomplete invoice by the prosecutor to the prosecutor may have prejudiced the cause of the prosecutor, but the defense's bias. Was unlikely. By no means did the defendant's co-defendant engage with him in challenging the impugned order, even otherwise, this unwanted action by the trial court was merely an irregular one. Is a remedy that was not discriminatory under Section 3737, CRPC. In any important case, the trial of the accused was on an advanced stage in the case of the accused and it showed that he had challenged the defective order only for delay. His trial review application was rejected in a void family advocate from Fort Abbas lawyer