Find a Lawyer

KARAMAT versus FAZAL AHMED

After the death of the original owner of Article Su 42 suite property, Article Q 42 Law Martyrdom (1984 1984 of the ten), the change of inheritance in relation to his property was approved in favor of his eight cousins and two daughters, After the mutation for more than 42 years, the deceased father's two sons, who along with their six other brothers and two sisters have inherited their share, on the basis of which the deceased father also has another daughter, who has inherited The alleged daughter was said to have been deprived. Neither the complainant nor his legal heirs had filed a complaint against the adoption of a hereditary change in favor of eight sons more than 42 years ago, nor did his two daughters prove acid. Apart from the two daughters, the other daughter said that the deceased / plaintiff has two sons, only the unaccompanied persons as witnesses who did not even qualify. Another daughter was born to prove the deceased under Article by64 of the 1984 law of 1984, which the plaintiff claims to be herself, denied her own behavior, which was approved 42 years ago. had gone. They were enjoying the benefits of the suit property, there was no opportunity to declare the suit, under the circumstances, the affected order was set aside by the High Court against the law. best advocate from Mangal Sada lawyer