Find a Lawyer

MOULVI TAJ MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 302 (b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the parties knew each other before appreciating the Section 7 evidence, no question could be raised about the mistaken identity of the accused by the witnesses themselves. The relationship of the witnesses was not enough. To declare them interested witnesses, because they had no personal purpose to falsely implicate the original culprits, nor could any such case be filed in the FIR There was a matter of hours delay, some people were seized in the case. The evacuation of the crime from the premises by the investigating officer will not mean that the testimony of the prosecution witnesses concerning the shooting, the accused persons were false, nor can it be excluded on the basis that the above. Empty privileges were sent with weapons of crime. To the firefighter, because such evidence can only support eye testimony, the crime ion and their evidence were substantiated by medical evidence, which itself was sufficient to maintain that conviction. Soon after, not all the suspects surrendered to the authorities and they were absconding and, on the day of their presence, any certificate obtained by them went to other places, they tried to obtain proof of their alibi. Could not be believed that the alibi taken by the accused was a liar and a doctrine and was rejected, the prosecutor said. Along with Miyabi, the trial and convictions against the accused were proved. The accused was retained in the case and accordingly the reference was answered inheritance advocates near Khangah Sharif lawyer