ALI AKBAR versus STATE
The proceedings under section 512 forfeiture of Sections 512 and 514 forfeiture were commenced during the trial against the accused for non-CCPC bail, against CRPC bail. However, both guarantees were later released from obligation, while, seizing the bonds of the applicant who were confirming the bonds of the bailiffs, was directed to deposit the amount of the bail bonds within the stipulated period. However, this guarantee is guaranteed and the applicant may be responsible for paying the applicant / confirmatory bond amount for any offense under Section 514. For the incorrect verification of the guaranteed ability to provide guarantees under CR PC but this bond confirmator is not covered by Section 514, CR PC, so liable to pay the same amount Can be made. Bonds, which he certified in person, could be liable for litigation if it turns out that the person certified by him was not a special person. Virtual code was not provided by the Code of Conduct, it was not implemented under the Code, nor will it attract the application of Section 5 Cr Cr, CR PC Trial Court, under the circumstances section 141414, CR PC Exceeded its authority under the provisions of In a mechanical manner, an invalid order was recorded without the satisfaction of the independent judiciary, which could not be allowed to remain in the field, the order was dismissed by the High Court. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Dir lawyer