Find a Lawyer

KHAN KHEL versus HAJI NASIR

OV, R 20 & O IX, R 13 Northwest Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act (X of 1987), sections 6 and 13 The pre-arrest pretrial order fails to appear in defendant's court on the alternative service, The case was. The trial court dismissed the request for separation of the ex parte decree filed by the discrete ex parte defendant, but the appellate court accepted the appeal, rejecting the trial court's order and the plaintiff felt distressed. The summons issued to the defendant was released, returned unsafe and the summons was issued three times, either returned unsafe or served to the defendant, then to the defendant's home. The filing of the notices was presented through an alternative source, but the defendant failed to appear, resulting in the ex parte order Processed, OV, R20, CPC accuracy requirements were not complied with because the defendant was not normally served by the registered AD. Neither by publication in a newspaper where the defendant had retired from service or could not be offered in public or refused to accept the service, or had not been heard for a long time and generally did not affect the service. The court was satisfied. Likewise, OV can order replacement service under R20 CPC, which can only be ordered if there are guaranteed conditions and OV, R 20, CPC's strictly I must comply with the irregularities when the defendants are forgiven. Suitable notice unless all attempts to affect the service in general are confirmed, the replacement of the service power of attorney advocate Karore Lalisan lawyer