Rushing quickly or negligently through Section 20 Ql Qalt-e-Khata appreciated the evidence even though the defendant had identified the accused before the trial, but in his statement under Section 154, Cr P.C. Other witnesses were not even mentioned. In its statement under Section 154, CR PC, the trial court identified the accused before the complainant, or the evidence before the trial court did not claim that the witnesses were present at the scene of the incident, or He arrived there shortly after, though his statement is under section 154. The CRPC was recorded long after the accident, the suspect was not identified at the location nor was he named in the FIR, and he was arrested after the incident of seventeen days. The identity of the parade had to be presented to a judicial magistrate for failure. Doing so made the investigation unfair, prosecution witnesses, superstitious convictions, could not be relied upon to record the suspect's conviction, the suspect's name was revealed to the investigating officer by the owner of the vehicle, but the prosecution The witness did not say after the investigation, though his name was listed on the challan sheet prosecutor's witness list. After failing to establish the charge against the accused without a doubt, conviction and conviction, he was set free, and he acquitted himself of the charge.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
