Find a Lawyer

BAHSIR AHMED ALIAS BASHIR versus STATE

The accused was acquitted on 15 Acc, 2001, on the delay of pressing on receipt of the guarantee grant only, Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 114, 147, 148 and 149, and I was charged with the case on 26 1 2002, but after that the matter could not go further, on the first date, the case was adjourned because the prosecution's witnesses were absent and the case property was not presented. Even in the history of the matter, the matter could not proceed. The police wanted the papers and on two other occasions the adjournment was sought by the accused's lawyer, but it was said that the entire formal process was not completed in the dates as it did not show that the case was prepared by the property. When he was charged, he was behind the bars of the prison after 15 7 2000. Overt act was charged with other accused, he could not be held indefinitely on the occasion of the presence of the accused, the accused was admitted in bail, under the circumstances. best law firms from Eminabad lawyer