Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 971/IB TO 973/IB AND 911/IB TO 913/IB OF 2006, DECIDED OIL 10TH MARCH, 2007. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 971/IB TO 973/IB AND 911/IB TO 913/IB OF 2006, DECIDED OIL 10TH MARCH, 2007.

Compliance with section 76 (10) Prosperity Bank Ordinance (XXII of 2000), deferred government grant offering cost as income and at the same time accounting for expenses accrued in bank entries account books. As was shown, it was only a formality that the amount equal to the value charged was shown as income at the same time, the equivalent of that amount was shown as expenses in the books of the account. Said Accounting Entries have no relevance to tax matters Since the unacceptable deduction was rightly made by the First Authority, the total value of assets purchased by @ Bank has been reduced by 10% and it was confirmed that the tax had no effect Since the income was not a grant income and was only recorded in the books of accounting to meet the required international accounting standards, this increase was not legally valid and the First Appellate Authority legally had the right to exclude it. The Appellate Division of the Department of Appeal rejected the tribunal on this point top civil advocates from Sangote lawyer