Find a Lawyer

ABDUL BASIT versus STATE

Definition of Section 9 (c) evidence led to the seizure of 17kg of marijuana and 15kg of opium, which were confirmed by witnesses who had no ill will or bitterness against it. After the opium trial court obtained and produced the marijuana samples, the remaining four were removed and a certificate was kept on record in this regard, which was issued by the court, the section 516A's marijuana samples. There was substantial evidence to be taken, CRPC said, that the samples obtained through the procedure given in the second section of the aforesaid section were investigated in connection with such crimes before destroying the property mentioned in the second section. Or the entire property will be considered in the process. The department did not have to issue notice to the accused even otherwise, the accused did not at any stage claim that the quantity of the substance recovered was wrongly mentioned or that the recovered goods were marijuana or There was no opiate, and therefore it could not be subjected to prejudice in any way that led to the destruction of the prohibited substance by the court, which was fully authorized to do so, thus, Was responsible for conviction and sentencing on the basis of the entire prohibited substances recovered and accordingly maintained online advocate from Hyderabad lawyer