MESSRS UNION NATIONAL BANK THROUGH ATTORNEY versus IQBAL AHMED MALIK
Section 11 and AXXI, R 37, 38, 39, dec 40 Application for the arrest and detention of the executor of the verdict of the decree filed by the petitioner for the arrest and detention of the accused Was made because the decision was not satisfied despite the implication of the decision. The fact that the High Court's appeal against the order was dismissed would not prove to be the purpose of recovering the deductible amount from the plaintiff's detention of the accused as there is no allegation in the scope of section 51, CPC. Will come, while the lender of the decision was representing himself. Advocate and Appeal are pending before the Supreme Court In such a situation no purpose can be fulfilled by the petition made by the applicant / decree holder, nor in the circumstances of this case does the decision remain that of the Decree. The request filed by the holder was dismissed for the satisfaction of the decree by other means for the ownership of the judgment debtor.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
