Find a Lawyer

KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION, KARACHI versus A.H. FAREED, MANAGER ADMINISTRATION

Section 100 (2), Schedule VI, Part II Criminal Procedure (V 1898); , According to By-Law No. 40 of the MetroPolitan Corporation indictment, he had not obtained a license to operate the factory. The accused was responsible for paying a maximum of Rs. 10,000 per annum because the license fee fixed by the accused's official player was that he never refused to get the license nor from paying the license fee. And requested that they request a license from the MetroPolitan Corporation. On the receipt of the license fee proposed by the notification dated 30 11 1980, the trial court held that the corporation authorities had mistakenly charged the accused with the responsibility of paying the license fee of Rs 10,000 per year. And this excuse was wrong. Holding license denied to the accused for operating the factory and they did not violate any of the corporation's rules or by-laws. The trial court had acquitted all the accused accordingly, observing that if the accused obtained the license for payment of license fee at the rate of Rs 50, they would be relieved of this responsibility. The defendants will be punished for the month and if it is said that the license fee is paid, it was not appropriate that the corporation officials did not clarify their position on the law and wrongly obtained the license T Had claimed. Ten thousand rupees annually and fines jobs for advocates from Warah lawyer