Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMEED versus MST. AISHA BIBI

Article 72 Accepting the Thumb Impression of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Document Impact The Plaintiff Demands Specific Performance of a Suit Property Seller Contract Against His Father The Respondent Questioned His Thumbs on the Contract Did not deny the impression of the plaintiff, but rather that the plaintiff denied the contention that the plaintiff was his son, that he obtained his vacant signature on the pretext of crossing the property with the relevant authorities, but the trial court Ruled in favor of the plaintiff but the High Court with the jurisdiction of the appeal A confirmed case. The impression of his thumb on a sale contract was not enough to prove to the seller that its implementation and the supply of documents to create a right in the property should in fact be executed by the person who The accused allegedly executed such a document, the plaintiff was an illiterate person and, without being aware of the contents of the document, made the impression of his thumb on it. Understand that the contract is a contract and to respond to your thumb's impression on the contract, subject to its contents. Winnipeg will be proof to verify the original document to the strength. The court rightly stated that the sale agreement was not proved by the defendant and the Supreme Court refused to conclude by the High Court plaintiff that the evidence was on record. However, the relief equivalent to the specific performance the plaintiff also failed to approve immigration advocate from Timergara lawyer