Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus STATE

Sections 341, 427, 109, 147, 148 and 149 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Constitutional Law Enforcement Act (1X4 of 1974), the testimony of the complainant praised for the evidence of section 5 was consistent and reliable, with one of the deceased. The recording of the death statement was also admitted by the defense's two witnesses of the prosecution, who were independent, neither related to the complainant nor had any molestation or grudge against the accused party, it was said that the two witnesses It is shown that on the basis of past hostility, the accused were targeted and killed by the conspirators. Five innocent persons, as compiled by the prosecution, were found guilty of revenge for the murder of the son of an accused, in which case the prosecuting attorney argued that the prosecution's witnesses had failed to explain the weapons. ? The shootings were carried out on five people, whose firing was executed, and they were repelled because in such cases it was not humanly possible for the prosecution's witnesses to determine who fired the two main accused. Who was injured and by what weapon he was executed, proved not only by the ocular version of the complainant and his brother, but also by the other persons, the story of the prosecution of independent and impartial witnesses. Further support was made in the declaration of the death of a victim, the police officer recorded and the complainant and others This was testified by witnesses stgash, the medical evidence in the form of the deceased's autopsy reports in the full version of the prosecution. The prosecution's evidence was authentic and truthful, which, without any further co-operation, would allow the accused to record the conviction and sentence. jobs for advocates from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer