Find a Lawyer

MASTER MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus STATE

Section 498 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 365B, bail prior to arrest, police confirmation, after registering the case, the alleged kidnapping statement in which he stated that he was himself Sue. Voluntarily and voluntarily, had a marriage contract with the co-accused and no one abducted her Investigating Officer recorded the statement of the alleged abductor under Section 161, CR PC. It could not be stated that he was under pressure from the accused. When she was under police custody, it was also stated that she had also presented it to the al-Qaeda / judicial magistrate to record her statement under 5/164. When the car was charged, he could speak out against the accused and get his statement. The Investigation Officer confirmed his first statement to the Investigation Officer pursuant to Section 161, when the CCP requested the Investigation Officer to appear before the Judicial Magistrate for a medical examination of the alleged abductor. Disapproved for self-medical examination under RPC. Sessions Judge; in which she confessed that she had previously appeared before the police with the accused and wanted to make a statement in their favor and now she wanted to make a statement against them. And the complainant, who was a school teacher, was not. The certificate issued by the headmaster at the time of the incident made it clear that the accused was present at the school when the accused had been further investigated, his interim pre-arrest warrant had already been approved. Lately immigration advocates phone number from Rangoo lawyer