Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. versus AHMAD SHAH

Applicants referred to in Section 115 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Articles 8, 42 and 54, Appeal Court for Appeal and Possession of a Revised Scope Suit for Permanent Order and Occupation. Decisions and orders were filed against the trial court for review. The appellate court had extensively discussed every aspect of the case and dealt in detail on the same issue, which there was no room for further consideration, the two courts below appreciated the evidence in their original context and It did not face any legal or factual weakness, which guaranteed intervention. The High Court, under section 115, was not open to the proper exclusion by the two courts below the finding of facts, especially when there was no indication of the High Court regarding any particular misrepresentation or non-reading of evidence. Was made while the amendments were not sitting in the jurisdiction to interfere with the conclusions of the courts below unless it was established that the decisions of the courts below were without jurisdiction or that the following courts were unlawful or material Committed the rule which resulted in the abortion of justice which resulted in the two courts to file Was made illegal decision after discussing all the professional rules of evidence and examine the case. The following was a defect in the court decisions that were in accordance with the evidence in the files. The judgments of the courts were neither given any illegal interference nor any kind of interference, nor would any interference be given, under the circumstances of the High Court. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Zahir Pir lawyer