Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (i) (ii), 337 F (i), 34 and 109 pre-arrest bail, six-month delay in confirming FIR, confirming no explanation After that, there was a good possibility that the accused was falsely involved in the case because the complainant has ample time to consult, pending civil litigation between the parties, the defendant's bead Due to false involvement of the accused cannot be ruled out. During the course of the investigation, the investigating officer found that neither of the two suspects was armed with any weapons nor did he complain. He suffered some kind of injury, though he was present on the spot, the multiple liability of the accused can be determined only after the record of the evidence and not at the bail-out stage, the investigation revealed that the accused was armed. was not. Arsenal, no question of recovery of any weapon of crime from the accused, the witness's account contradicted the medical evidence. Crimes against the accused were not banned. Yes, the challan was presented in court and the accused was not required for any investigation or recovery of any weapon of crime; sending the accused to jail would not serve any useful purpose in these circumstances. The accused's arrest warrant was approved, accordingly solicitors from Khewra lawyer