MUHAMMAD ASIQ versus STATE
The names of all the suspects were listed in the FIR and they were shown to be equipped with various types of firearms, under Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 379, 448, 452, 148 and 149 pre-arrest bail. The accused was convicted of indiscriminate firing and theft of various items, including cash and all the accused were convicted and six associates were declared innocent by a single Investigation Officer who was involved in the incident. Neither can be attributed to an unlawful cause or the responsibility of the accused. The FIR and the criminal role assigned to them were assigned. The recovery of the stolen items has also been affected by the statements of the prosecution witnesses under Section 161, CRPC, and the statement that the complainant was unable to give exceptional exception to the arrest of the case. ? Bail, application was dismissed in this regard
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Daulat Pur lawyer