Find a Lawyer

IBRAHIM versus STATE

The testimony of Section 9 (c) and 25 of the testimonial sentence, the reduction of both the prosecution's testimony, fully supported the prosecutor's story and he remained stable, integrated and successfully subjected to scrutiny, the lawyer for the accused. The contradiction indicated by was not serious. The nature and these individuals cannot be considered sufficient to make the trial unsuccessful or to suspend recovery. Despite the fact that the witnesses belonged to the police department, which itself could not be considered a good place to dismiss their statements, the defense was not able to break their testimony. Or indicate any illicit desire, which could indicate that he was a liar against the accused, nor was there any allegation made by the accused that the property was tampered with during the transit process or The remaining property was not disclosed in the marijuana chemical analyst report that the sealed packet was received. In the absence of any allegations by the Templars that the signature of the minor witnesses was present, the lawyer's arguments for the accused were not valid; the provisions of section 103, the facts and circumstances of the CCP application. Was not on , Private persons do not come forward to give evidence in such matters. No serious wrongdoing was found with the evidence against the accused, but the trial court upheld the conviction of the accused but the sentence was reduced from two years to two years. The penalty, however, will remain, accordingly \ r \ n \ r \ n list of advocates from Kalam lawyer