Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HASSAN HAQQANI versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL GUJRANWALA/DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HAFIZABAD

RR 65 and 72 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VIII, R11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Summary of Constitutional Petition Election Petition Summary Request VII, R 11, CPC It was stated that the applicant could not contest the selection of returning candidates as the No. 1 matriculation. The appeal was dismissed provided that in order to maintain the election application, one simply had to become a candidate that the bill The applicant was a candidate within the meaning of the Duty Election Rules, 2005 and can properly maintain the election petition challenging the outcome of the dispute, the provisions of O VII, R 11, CPC only I can ask. The cause of action was not disclosed in the election petition or was barred by law, but in the present case none of these cases were present. Even none of the violations mentioned in the Rule 72 of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2005 occurred during the trial of the Election Tribunal, thus accepting the application under OVII, R 11, CPC. Was not exceeded. Scope divorce advocates from Noor kot lawyer