Find a Lawyer

QAZI GHULAM RASOOL versus MUHAMMAD SHAH

Sections 5 and 6 determine the nature of the sale / transaction transaction, as well as verbal proof of the prior image proof, as well as an audio cassette proving that the transaction between the defendant / seller and seller was a sale. But it was disclosed only to avoid the emotional right to exchange. The testimony of the local commissioner and the report presented further proved that the plaintiff / Wendy remained in the possession of the house, which allegedly exchanged suit land. It was from the Court of Appeal that the original transaction was a matter of sale. The pre-emptive right was established by a copy of the twenty-one Shejra Kishtwar case in which the plaintiff was declared the owner of the land which was in accordance with the suit land, the performance of the students was not disputed nor the suit land. The price issue was pressed, the order was affirmed in favor of the plaintiff. Subject to collecting specific amount accordingly. r \ n \ r \ n family advocate from Jatoi lawyer