Find a Lawyer

ZAHIR HUSSAIN SHAH AND OTHERS versus SHAH NAWAZ KHAN

The offender convicted and sentenced in an appeal against the section 417 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Criminal Law Enforcement Act (IX of 1974), section 5, is acquitted, But the Shariah court acquitted the accused under a designated order and the complainant filed an appeal, according to the infringement order, both the prosecution and the defense, when taken in a dispute and in their original view If praised, then the version taken by the defense is inappropriate, suffocating, and because of this it appears that Section 242, CR PC However, in his statements, the accused never carried the counter version. Similarly, in their statements under 34 342, the PC suspects also failed to take the specific counter version, the accused, in the presence and witness of the witness, confessed by the defense that the blood stained clay and stones from the standing position. Recovery also suggested that in fact the incident was alleged by the prosecution, which says that the evidence of the witnesses who stood the cross-examination examination constituted the fact that the prosecution Was charged by and not by the defense prosecution version who is more likely and controlling The conviction, as it was taken from the day of the incident and not later than a year when the defense took over, while examining the prosecution's testimony, the defense's claim was not supported by any evidence headed by the prosecution or the defense. Was presented by the source. Prosecution for delay in filing FLR, trial court finding satisfactory best advocate from Khyber Agency lawyer