Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMANULLAH KHAN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,

Applicants for the Settlement Settlement in Arts 4, 24 and 1991 have claimed that they are residents of various pieces of land where they built raw and packed houses and have been living with their families and children for the past 55 years. ? Applicants are in the grip of demolition of their valuable property. Under Articles 4 and 24 of the Constitution, he appealed to the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court and requested that the removal of valuable property of the applicants, declaring the authorities without legal authority and any legal influence. Was not claimed to be able to be sued for any legal right or title to the property in his possession; he was a transgressor and had already benefited immensely from his illegal and unlawful occupation. The construction to be erected by the applicants was also without any sanctioned plan and according to law. North was revealed that the request was made by the property in the possession of those authorities bring any benefit, but for the public to keep the petition without merit, in these circumstances immigration advocates phone number from Bhakkar lawyer