Find a Lawyer

FAHEEM AHMED versus ATA-UR-REHMAN

Section 12 Property Act (I82 of 1882), Section 554 Contract Act (IX 1879), Section 55 Suit, for mutual consent were twice extended by the plaintiff for the specific performance of the real estate sale agreement by the plaintiff. Documentation is required to be completed within the agreed upon period Issuance of notice by the plaintiff indicates willingness / consent to complete the matter and demands the defendant to perform his or her portion of the agreement at that time The refusal to execute the sale of the land was due to the essence of the contract because the deadline for performance had expired - whatever. The agreement was not set to expire at that time was not mentioned in the contract that was the essence of the contract. The contract will terminate automatically No timeframe could be set for the performance of a contract because the time being was not intended to be the essence of the contract at the time the contract was made. The contract is terminated. In the circumstances the suit was ordered \ r \ n \ r \ n law firms from FR Bannu lawyer