Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 1870/LB TO 1873/LB OF 2006, DECIDED ON 8TH FEBRUARY, 2007. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 1870/LB TO 1873/LB OF 2006, DECIDED ON 8TH FEBRUARY, 2007.

Sections 154, 56, 65, 13 and 87 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Sections 114, 176, 121 and 111 of the Service of Notice Assessment, a non-resident assessment year 2002 to 2003 and tax year 2003 to 2005 assessment The order does not mention that the appellant was ever presented with any notice nor did the Assessing Officer make any agent of any assessee despite the fact that he had been appointed by the non-resident Assisi. The affidavit presented an affidavit under which the statement was not accepted under any legal notice. Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 or Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for submission of income tax declarations or to be presented to tax authorities or to present any evidence or any document in person or by post or messenger. Or was offered through alternative services. And that the Assisi had Pakistani and British citizenship and had passports from both countries and was non-resident in the years under consideration, despite the fact that the department has been denied A similar affidavit was filed before the appellate authority Appellate Tribunal, vacating the First Appellate Authority's order on the legal issue of non-service of notice, without giving due notice. Diagnostic orders approved under section 63 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 have been revoked in the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n famous high court advocate from Kandiaro lawyer