COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus HAJI MASUD-UR-REHMAN AND OTHERS
Section 27 Wealth Tax Rules, 1963, R8 (2) (C) (I) and (3) Assessing the Market Value of Properties for the Value of Wealth Tax was not accepted by the Assessing Officer. Was. The property of the estate at their net cost which led to a complaint to the Assessors who had filed appeals before the Commissioner, in which the order in favor of the Assessment was approved and against the appeal filed by the department, The appellate tribunal had appealed to the High Court, which questioned the law involved, whether the appellate tribunal's admission was valid, that the property market value was to be determined first and then their GALV and The least of these two should be adopted for tax purposes purposes, while no such conditions have been laid. Was. In Wealth Tax Rules, R3 (3) of 1963, R8 (3) of the Wealth Tax Rules 1963 provided a mechanism / scheme for how buildings should be vacated or vacant. The Commonwealth's Saddle Roll left no doubt to argue with its first proviso, and the Appellate Tribunal's view was in accordance with the law and the rules followed by the Appellate Tribunal in its true letter and spirit. And followed it correctly. Understanding the true intention and purpose of the law, since the tribunal does not violate any of the provisions of the law, cannot be considered an exception.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
