Find a Lawyer

MST. KOUSAR PERVEEN versus STATE

The testimony of the prosecutor's testimony that the testimony of the section 302 evidence showed that he did not see the accused while he was committing the crime, however, he did not base the facts on the complainant's knowledge of the commission of the crime committed. That was, Eaton's rope, scar and bandage were not recovered. The bullets allegedly used 1 or the commission of the crime, there was no support in the prosecution's case as there was no evidence to prove that these events were brought on record, the doctor said. Some twin weapons were used to kill the deceased The possibility of using the rope for the commission was not given an ant command because of the crime, but no definite opinion was given on the preparation of the post-mortem report. No reasonable explanation was given for the delay and the FIR was brought to the record trial court while the accused Failure to praise this alleged motive in sentencing did not prove to be true and the origin of the incident was not proved, the prosecutor was unable to rely on the defendant, given the shroud because of the suspicion, in these circumstances bad. Was done immigration advocates email from Mirpur Khas lawyer