Find a Lawyer

SAID MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD AZEEM

Demonstration of the Record of Submission recorded under Sections 161 and 540 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 337 and 341 of the 161, against the provisions of the CRPC during the course of its life. A review was directed under which the statement of the victim was recorded. Under Section 161, CCPC refused to exhibit it during its lifetime, while it was required to record the statement of the Investigation Officer, which was filed under Section 173, CRPC. Is affiliated with and was cross-examined by the Defense Exhibition. There was actually a piece of evidence from a document that was subject to cross-examination. Whether or not he could have been accepted by the trial court at the time of the final verdict, Swine's appearance during the trial proceedings could not be ruled out simply because he was not kept with the witness at trial. The presence of the statement in question was not challenged. If the applicant / prosecutor's lawyer did not inadvertently disclose the statement, the prosecutor was presenting a new evidence or by doing so the prosecutor was exposed to any defects. Is trying to fill in the prejudice. The awareness of any person who has already been examined at any stage of the proceedings, if deemed necessary only for the determination of the dispute, may be recalled, as presented under section 404040, CRP C was the primary duty imposed on the court for the administration of justice. And the court could not base its opinion solely on its own merits. This is not valid top advocate from Doltala lawyer