Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMJAD versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 337 F (iii), 337 L (ii), 337 F (v), 452 and 34 bail, two investigations were made in the grant case, one, The sub-inspector and others were investigated by the Superintendent of Police and both accused and their accomplices in the investigation were declared innocent by the Investigation Officer, although this was not the court's objection, but, if it was not a reasonable content , As in the present case, it could not be lightly cleaned and the record had to be considered whether the inquiry officer's opinion was made as to whether the accused and his accomplices were located at the scene of the incident. Were not present and it is likely that the complainant had received. The other two accomplices injured in the collapse have already been granted bail. In view of the consistency strategy, the accused was also entitled to the same privileges. Who was not under the supporter. Section 497, CCP grant bail, as was the rule in cases and the refusal was exempt, the investigation of the case was completed, the challan was presented in court and the accused, who had been behind bars for the last 4 months. No Need for Further Investigation A temporary review of the evidence on record has revealed that the defendant's case was one of further investigation because he was charged at the time for linking it to the commission of the crime. The record didn't have enough evidence. Guarantee, under circumstances \ r \ n us immigration advocates from Deh Pathaan lawyer