Find a Lawyer

ZARAI TARAQTATI BANK LIMITED AND OTHERS versus MUSHTAQ AHMED KORAI

Section 2 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Former and Closing Transaction of Employees The term of the respondent's employment was laid by the Employment Service Tribunal and it was restored to the Bank with a benefit. ) Had not filed an appeal against it, the Service Tribunal ruled, and then when the Supreme Court declared Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 a violation of the provisions of Article 1212 of the Constitution, the Bank signed the jurisdiction. With the restraining order withdrawn from the High Court, the order of withdrawal was set aside by the bank for all intents and purposes. Seven-year period, the service will not take any complaint against the decision, in favor of respondents Service has accepted the final status of the decisions adopted by the Tribunal and recognized. The final position, which was a past and closed deal for all purposes, the view taken by the HC that our lease did full justice and the Supreme Court denied the different view was denied leave to appeal. Was best law firm from Panjan Kisan lawyer