Find a Lawyer

SQN. LDR. (R) UMEED ALI KHAN versus DR. (MRS.) SULTANA IBRAHIM

Section 12 law in this testimony (10 of 1984), Article 59 Contracting Handwriting Special Scope / Sale Receipt and Sale Agreement of Discrimination Claims that Defendant has agreed to sell his property to him And in turn, she considers sales. The trial court had implemented the cell receipt, but the lower appellate court on the trial hearing dismissed the case in favor of the plaintiff's decision, relying on the handwriting expert's request and the order passed by the lower appellate court. The High Court set aside the jurisdictional jurisdiction. And the contract of sale two were two separate documents which had their own specific properties, significance and import and both were not synonymous or exchanged Expert evidence was only certified or direct or circumstantial evidence where proof of certiorari. Priority cannot be given where confidence is affected and credible evidence was available The opinion of the handwriting expert was inconsistent but it was not as conclusive evidence and could be ruled out with strong independent evidence. The expert's opinion was always a threat to the factual basis of the written fact but the receipt could not be brought in for the sake of its contents as it could not be substantiated and could not be substantiated. To guide any other strong and concrete evidence even if the receipt was signed by the plaintiff, but it cannot be proved that the amount mentioned was obtained in lieu of the suit property agreement, any offensive, oral or This was not confirmed by documentary evidence. By directing any conclusive or evidentiary evidence jobs for advocates from Bewal lawyer