Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO. 1613/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 8TH JULY, 2006. versus I.T.A. NO. 1613/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 8TH JULY, 2006.

Section 221, 152 (6) and 127 Income Tax Ordinance (XXXX of 1979), Section 87 and 129 error correction were denied request for tax reduction The department's request for correction was rejected on the preliminary. Under section 152 (6) of the order, the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 was not enforceable, taking advantage of Section 2121 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the appeal could not again be aggravated by the same issue. This was an administrative order, no appeal was given and filing such a mere correction would not make the original dispute a valid order under section 152 (6) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, section 221 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Could not be submitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) under the appeal. Income Tax Ordinance 2001 provides for error correction by amending any order by the Commissioner, Commissioner (Appeal) or Appellate Tribunal since each order requesting correction was explicit, section 152 (6) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 ), Any reviewers turned to reform, taking advantage of this fact to resolve the issue / dispute to the level of appeals. Appeal to the jurisdiction under section 221 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, any order which did not appear to have appeared in the circumstances, if the order of rehabilitation was concerned, the appeal on the occasion of inquiry was maintained. , Subject to the restrictions listed as the 2002 PTD 570 divorce advocates from Samundri lawyer