Find a Lawyer

MST. SALAMAN versus MUHAMMAD HASSAN

Sections 42 & Q 54 of the Constitution of 1984 (Arts of 1984), Arts 2 (1) (C) and 90 Oral Sales \ Lady Seller Proof Plaintiffs demanded declaration that they were sued on the basis of oral sale. Own them. The claim by the Lady Seller plaintiff in 1979 that the execution of a sale by the Special Counsel of the Lady Seller in favor of the defendants on the same ground was the sale of 21 12 1980, on the other hand, the Seller also filed Was the one in which they filed the application. Her land was not sold to anyone and the plaintiff was in possession of the land because her tenants were both suits immovable. The suit filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed while the lawsuit was ordered by the trial court, on record. After examining all the material available, the confirmation of the trial court's validity was the most important evidence presented by the defendants in the Daily Magazine, because Patwari Hala presented and stated that he had obtained the testimony of the witnesses. Due to the ban on the journal and in those days, the change was not admitted so the accuracy of the entries in the daily wiki was linked so it is stated that the document is correctly believed by the appellant court's witness, Who had been cultivating suit land for about eight to eight years. / The 9 year old tenant of the seller was another important witness who testified that he had been paying the share of the produce to the plaintiffs for four years because the plaintiffs had been instructed for the residual evidence It was proved that the woman had sold her land. The statements of the plaintiff's witnesses were convincing and convincing and after some years the record online advocate from Jhal Magsi lawyer