ABDUR REMAN versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR
O VII, R 2, O XXI, Rr 10, 23 A, 64 & O XLI, R 1 For the receipt of the suit filed against the order of sale on the sale of the property attached for the receipt of the suit, keep the order The person who filed the petition was attached to the said property in Tehelika and was then ordered to sell the execution. In which it was claimed that he was the owner of the auctioned property and the said property could not be auctioned, without specifying a separate share of the judgment, however, with the explanation that Only the person who made the decision for the part said that the property would be sold. Each participant has the right to dispose of his share subject to the final distribution of the joint property of the Joint, there is no restriction against sale by auctioning the shares of the judgment debtor as specified in the appeal of the unwanted order, As there was no power, the decedent / appellant's mother requested time to consult her son so that the person with this statute should be called upon to pay the decree and give the appellant three months. In which they will pay. If the appellant fails to do so, the amount of the undisclosed amount to the decree-holder will proceed with the first appeal against the sale of the property. Order was dismissed with such hits
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Tarnol lawyer