Find a Lawyer

CAPTAIN-PQ CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. SARGODHA ROAD, FAISALABAD THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT OFFICER REVENUE/COLLECTOR, FAISALABAD

Section 42 and Government 54 Colonial Public Land (Punjab) Act (v. 1912), Section 10 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 52 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), VII, R 11 Declaration and Order for Permanent The Prohibited Lease of State Land (Plaintiff) filed the first suit for relief against interference with its occupation and regularization of the lease, in which the first case provided for the interim relief to the plaintiff through the Colony Department. The suit land allotment was challenged in favor of AK. After the trial, the trial court adjourned the matter after consolidating the two cases. :: Appeal justification was done in favor of AA and then in favor of R, in the case of plaintiffs suit, thus affected by the rule of lease pendencias and revolt. d. Such suit does not affect the actual cause of action taken by the plaintiff. Plots cannot be dismissed or changed due to non-disclosure of the proceedings at such stage. Land suit in favor of R-Plaintiff has been superseded. The trial court, in order to make the appropriate modifications to the trial, so as to maintain its cases, especially in the situation where the trial court, under its internal jurisdiction, may reassert the parties to the position where they originally stood. It was as if the injunction had been given a restraining order. Not being violated The offensive verdict was illegal, weak and based on a wrong exercise of jurisdiction, the High Court accepted the review request, set aside the unwanted orders and stayed. best law firm from Chak Sheza lawyer