Find a Lawyer

MST. TAZEEM BEGUM versus JAHANDAD

The delay in filing the FIR in the re-enactment of Articles 302, 337, 148 and 149 references is no external injury. The five accused, including three brothers, were sent to trial for trial while the two accused were acquitted by the trial court. While the two accused were convicted and sentenced under Section 337, PPC. He was sentenced to one year imprisonment and one accused under Section 302 PPC and sentenced to death. The High Court set aside the sentence under section 302 PPC and the accused was acquitted, yet all the injured persons, including the deceased, were listed with a delay of 21 hours. He arrived at the hospital within hours after hearing the incident, while acquitting the other two accomplices, suggesting that their involvement could result in consultation and deliberation, given their late impact on the case. With no external injury to the chest or trunk. The victim's body was reported to have been partly injured by the injuries suffered by the tractor-TR collision. The Medical Officer of the cross-examination revealed the cause of the injury, which could in most cases be the result of the accident and This could be the result of a collision with heavy machinery, not bicycles. The accused cannot be excluded from the complaint by the complaining party on the grounds of consultation and probability, on account of which the other two accused were already acquitted by the trial court. And against whom the complaining party or the state judge of the High Court did not file any appeal while the accused was acquitted. Was not crooked and therefore the reasons given property advocate from Kot Addu lawyer