Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYUB versus IFTIKHAR AHMAD QURESHI, RETURNING OFFICER, FOR SENATE ELECTIONS 2006 FATA

Sections 34 and 47 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 62 (c), the scope of the Senate's age-defining election certificates and the scope of admission to the National Identity Card, assumed the selection of the respondents on the basis that the submission of nomination papers At that time he was low. The applicant presented a NADRA official over 30 years of age who stated that the defendant used a redundant national ID card to hide his real age. The respondents presented their testimony to their father and his It also issued a court-approved decree declaring the correct age of the defendant. The decree had not been finalized, neither the admission in the educational certificates nor the admission in the ID card was the final proof of the date. It was officially submitted by the applicant that his record did not contain the definitive proof of the actual date of birth when the authority did not. Claim the date of birth of the identification card, then the election tribunal had only the evidence of the respondent's father, who not only stated the date of the respondent's birth but also the history of his other children. The birth was also stated, because at the time of filing the nomination papers, the respondents were not less than thirty years of age, they were eligible to contest the elections and were disqualified under Article 62 of the Constitution and the Senate (Election) Act, 1975. Was not encountered, the application was dismissed in circumstances list of advocates from Zhob lawyer