Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Advantages of Doubts of Evidence 193, 466 and 471 Evidence In the civil appeal, the accused disclosed himself to the appellant's lawyer as stated by the son J. Appellate Court and I named a person in pursuance of this order. Accordingly I appeared before the appellate court lawyer. Respondents applied for the effect saying that I was a fictitious person, said that I had been discontinued about 3 3/4 days ago by an MM and contacted her. Said that he should accompany her to court and that he should say that I was a son. What I further dismissed about Jay Syed was that he did not appoint the accused as his lawyer in his statement under Section 342, the CCPC denied all the prosecution's allegations and claimed. It was that the lawyer for whom he appeared as a lawyer had executed the General Power of Attorney in his favor. , But about 3 months after the death certificate in charge of Democracy expired, who said that the prosecutor told the attorney that the power of attorney was born, there is no evidence to suggest that. The power of attorney was fake or not implemented when I alleged that from the beginning he had litigation in which he became a lawyer for I legally, which he said I specifically told. It is alleged that his father had appointed the accused as his lawyer through a document containing his late signature. The father prosecution could not prove under the circumstances that the accused was not the victim's lawyer. The prosecution failed to prove the accused against any reasonable doubt, top advocate from Haripur lawyer