H./DR. MASHOOD ASLAM DAR versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH, ISLAMABAD
Section 3 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), delay in appeal of section 5 intra-court appeals, was barred from time to time for contempt of appeal for good reason, even if only time was obtained to obtain a copy of the ug designated decision While only counting the appeal filing limit. The petition for delayed concession was that the appellant should have a good prima case on the merit, there should be no obstruction in his way thus delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Hardly for condolences this can hardly be termed a sufficient cause. Appellant failed to state sufficient cause for delayed concession; his plea for delay was dismissed; appeal cannot be filed beyond the time limit set by law. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mardan lawyer