FAZAL BACHA versus ABDUL QADIR
Section 497 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) Conduct of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 365 A / 381 A / 148/149 Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 22 Guarantees, Identity Parade Objects and Scope Grants were charged directly with the indictment and it was assigned a special role where the complainant was imprisoned in the house of the accused The broken pieces of the iron chain with which his feet were tied were recovered, the suspect being told, that the identity parade had not been held. An independent witness saw the recovery of pieces of iron chains, no previous rivalry or ill will be made when false accusations were made against the accused along with his co-accused, and there is enough evidence on record to attach them to the commission. Was. Examining the identity of the crime, although not required by law, was a way to test the authenticity of the eye-witnesses / complainant's evidence. Conduct of an identity parade to claim the opportunity to see and indict an accused will not constitute a defendant's right to claim bail, thereby preventing the high / In view of the growing trend, the High Court refused. The accused should be released on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Shogram lawyer