Find a Lawyer

GHULAM AKBAR versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

The appellate court's pre-arbitration trial by the plaintiff in the Section 13 trial was not appropriate only on the assumption that the defendant and the witnesses had spoken together with the intent of deceiving the defendant. And if the plaintiff had a superior position, the defendants could not buy the suit. The appellate court's finding was that the plaintiff would know of the transaction because the sale was made at an open meeting, also based on the assumption that the witnesses had permanently deposed that they were in a permanent bail in Talbi. The fact of the plaintiff's Dera was made that he did not mention the square number fort where the Dera was located, especially when the witnesses were not examined on such facts, which the witnesses proved. Was not offended. Appellate finding in cross examination has been conditional and not proven by the evidence on record Pakistan, top advocate family court from Killa Saifullah lawyer