MEHMOOD versus STATE
Section 2? b (b) / 34 34 Definition of evidence, reduction in the case of two versions and if both versions were adjudicated, a defense version was supported which documented the evidence and the circumstances to prove that the accused. The dispute was on the ground and on the day the victim and his brother had committed corruption in the land of the accused, the accused had the right to private defense of the property, whether the victim and his accomplice were armed or they had committed any criminal attack against the accused. Evidence was not available, in these circumstances the right to privacy was not extended to the cause of death, the trial court found in the circumstances. It was once found that the accused had exceeded his right to private defense of the property. Medical evidence does not support the prosecution's case; the hostility between the parties over the land occupied in the dispute is in the prosecution's testimony. Their statements before the trial court suppressed the facts and did not come true The statements of the witnesses of the prosecution along with the real story also encountered contradictions on the material points, their statements, in the cases trial court As denied, the accused was not allowed to be punished under section 302 (b) / 34 in the circumstances. The conviction of the PPC accused was replaced with offenses under section 2302 (b) /, 34, section 2302 (c) / under 34 of the PPC, the PPC accused has already been charged for more than eleven years. The conviction was already reduced by them
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Musakhel lawyer