MUZAMMAL HUSSAIN versus STATE
Sections 2 302 (b) /, 34, 4 324 / & & and 7 337 D / evidence 34 After a few minutes of occurrence in the dark of night, prosecutors 'witnesses could not take a closer look at the attackers' faces. Therefore, any assailant was mentioned in the FIR or in the statements of the witnesses The details of the accused in the FIR are general in nature, while the witnesses cannot be helpful in identifying the complainant as well. It was virtually impossible to hold the identity of the accused in the parade two years and ten months after the incident, even if otherwise, the identification parade would not have taken any legal procedure and required precautionary measures and by the investigating officer. The pair were kept in custody, not relying on the alleged extra-judicial confession He could. The suspect was jointly in the police station with no identifiable value, as the presence of the police officer was unacceptable, clearly introduced by the dishonest police officer through a padding and a relative of the complainant Convincing the medical evidence to testify was of no consequence to the accused, since no weapons were recovered during the investigation. The suspect was acquitted under suspicion
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Ghari Dupatta lawyer