Find a Lawyer

NIAZ AHMED versus SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL, BAHAWALPUR

The accused was not being released from jail despite completing his full term, section 561A & 402C of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), sections 302 (b) and 392/397/34, the trial court affirmed. Was punished under section 302. b), PPC and he was sentenced to twenty-five years in prison. The RI accused was also convicted under Section 392/397/34, PPC and sentenced to fourteen years RI. All the convictions were ordered to be sentenced together and the culprits were sent to the level. Stay tuned. The jail administration of the Supreme Court dismissed the conviction as nine years in prison, while the death sentence should have been treated as a single sentence, with a maximum sentence of 25 years, and a second count. Will be merged with fourteen years sentence Impact of sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment was not predicted as PLD 2005 SC 163, hence, the judgment till 219 2004, all legal waivers designated Received by the accused and if his credibility is increased, if withdrawn, he will be restored to his past status and closed trans. The jail authorities were instructed to calculate the actual jail term after the accused had considered the two sentences simultaneously. And he increased the waiver he earned by 219 2004, after which, if the accused had completed all his sentence, he would be released in accordance with the law, under which the petition was dealt with. famous supreme court advocate from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer