Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAMIM ALIAS SHAMI versus STATE

Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Sub-Maintenance Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) bail, denied a kilogram weighing 2 kilograms, was obtained from the possession of the accused and sent for full chemical examination There was no reasonably convincing content. Demonstrating maliciousness, it was difficult to understand why such a large amount of drugs could be thwarted by the anti-narcotic force on the woman / accused. Nothing was recorded to show the suspect or there was animosity of the air from the tribe he belonged to. Police Bald's charge of taking gold jewelery extortion by the police cannot be endorsed merely by the letter of authority under which it is guaranteed that the woman / accused of her will be arrested for raising suspicion at the bail stage. Voluntarily signing the jail in favor of the husband, there was also no material available on record under a special law to understand that the anti-drug force had any relation with the rival tribe, as the court supporters did. Violation of Section 3, Cr, CRPC Considerations Specific Exclusions of Its Application Under This Law Section 7497, CRPC Has been imposed under a prohibited clause, since it attracted a 14-year prison sentence. The RI simply did not have the right to guarantee the woman herself, in stable conditions, because it was not. Granted, the case does not qualify for bail approval, the bail application will be dismissed. \ r \ n \ r \ n family advocate from Muridkay lawyer