Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMED AWAN versus SUB-REGISTRAR, LAHORE

Sections 71, 77, & 73 and Finance 77 Finance Act (v. 1989) Punjab Finance Act (Amended by Section 15 of III of 2006) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Capital Value Taxes, past imposed and Before submitting the sale process for closed registration, the applicant temporarily sold the video of his land which was completed in the presence of the local commissioner and the applicant received the consideration amount for registration before registration 1 2006 A cell deed was presented but not registered. After some objections, the registration authorities asked the applicant to pay capital value tax as the issue of accuracy was completed in the date before registration was completed even when the applicant sold his signature and thumb mark in the presence of witnesses. Were kept on the documents. The seller appointed by the authorities has accepted the view, that the purchase or acquisition of title by the buyer was complete, after the amendment of section 7 of the Finance Act, 1989, the tax on such transactions which came into force from 1 7 2006. Through the provision of, Section 15 of the Finance Act, 2006, the sale transaction in question was a past and closed transaction as a transaction. Levy was concerned that the transaction could not be brought into the transaction, simply because the document number, book number, volume number or registration date could not be filled in, although for any reason the refusal was made by the registrar. The seal was registered. There was no other procedure for the Registrar to print or provide document numbers, book numbers, volume numbers or registration data, but other than to avoid any accusation of incompetence. advocate from Mehar lawyer