Find a Lawyer

NAZAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

The testimony of the prosecution agreed with the testimony of section 9 (c), 6 and 29, on the main features and material aspects of the case, which clearly stated that the accused was the driver of the truck from the secret cavity, which had 560kg / marijuana. Safe evidence was confirmed by the Chemical Examiner's report that it was alleged that the driver was in charge of the truck and all the articles contained therein were under his control and in the context of section 6 of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997 The occupation of the area was identified. The defendant had confessed to his presence in the truck at the time of the incident and had failed to prove his possession of "Chars" under Section 29 of the said Act, therefore, as the perpetrator of the crime Will be considered at And accordingly the conviction of the accused was maintained us immigration advocates from Sakrand lawyer