Find a Lawyer

ZARGAM KHAN versus STATE

Received a remand for a pre-arrest bail case, section 498 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), section 395/389/384/337 H (ii) / 147/148/149, which neither the accused nor his lawyer session on the date of confirmation. Appeared in court The accused Sessions Court had already received interim pre-arrest bail, however, after hearing by the prosecution, the accused approached the High Court for approval of the pre-arrest bail, requesting a pre-arrest bail. But the decision could not be made because of the absence. The arrest warrant was required to appear in the court of the accused at the time of the confirmation of the interim bail, and they must appear in court at every date during the hearing till the decision of the central petition. In the absence of the accused by the sessions court, there was a violation of the law framed by the Full Bench of the Lahore High Court (PLD 1981 Lahore 599). The order of the sessions court dismissed the request for bail before arrest. As a result, the defendants were ordered to appear before the court for a decision on their bail application, for which they were granted four days' security bail. \ r \ n advocates from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer