Find a Lawyer

SADARDIN ALIAS SADAR versus STATE

Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), section 646464 / ail 34 bail, no direct evidence was available against the accused FIR for approval of the rules, was delayed by 37 days and in the absence of any direct evidence. It cannot be said that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the accused had committed an offense under section 497, CRPC Prohibition Clause. Although the accused was a fugitive, it was not a definite rule that the fugitive was not entitled to bail in any case, bail could be given to any fugitive on the law that there is no reasonable basis for believing that the accused was unconditional. Guaranteed. The offense, but there are sufficient grounds for further investigation into the crime, bail cannot be prevented as a punishment and if reasonable suspicion arises, in relation to the accused's participation in the crime, it is better that the accused be jailed. Instead of being held on bail, criminal cases should be decided on the basis of the facts of each case, and there is no universal principle, especially in matters of bail. In each case the service can be pressed, as well as the facts and circumstances of each case depends, the accused was admitted in bail, in the circumstances famous high court advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer