Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus STATE

Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860) Section 302/454/427/324/342/354/382/148/149/109/337 A (ii) / 337 F (iii) / 337 F (ii) Bail, refuse The accused was specifically named in the FIR, with the specific role of causing the firearm to fire and he was the original suspect. During the investigation, the suspect was indeed found, but the magistrate refused. Was denied the opinion of the police. The court especially when this case was not based on sound material. Eye witnesses, including the injured witnesses, had the accused permanently involved in the crime, determining the distance between the victim and the accused, believing the medical evidence, determining the cause of the deceased's death and considering the accused's alibi application Needed deep appreciation, which was not valid at the bail-out stage, swearing on the Koran during interrogation was alien to the criminal proceedings conducted by the High Court, while guaranteeing the co-accused. The defendant did not help again as it was stated that the accused had not received fatal fire injury in the adjournment case. The bail was to begin in this case, the bail was denied to the accused. list of supreme court advocates from Gari Mori lawyer